Pls display type or super amoled. Super AMOLED or IPS. What's better

We continue the section on how to choose the right smartphone that will delight the user. We have already talked: what are there, which is better, the pros and cons. Today we will focus on choosing a smartphone screen. The topic is quite complex and extensive, since by now there are many technologies for the production of displays, their protection, in addition, they are presented with a variety of diagonals, with different ratios, and so on. It is the screen that often becomes a stumbling block when choosing a smartphone. It is not surprising. The display is exactly the part of the device that we have to work with more. In case of a wrong choice, it is highly likely that the screen will cause a lot of inconvenience: poor quality picture, low brightness, poor sensitivity. But do not worry, today we will touch upon each of the aspects, telling you about all the intricacies of choosing a smartphone screen.

Smartphone matrix type

It's worth starting with the type of matrix. In many respects, the quality will depend on the choice of the type of screen matrix. So, today it is customary to distinguish three types:

1. TN + film
2. AMOLED

The first two are based on liquid crystals, the second on organic LEDs. Each of the types is represented by several subspecies (in the case of IPS, more than 20 different ones), which one way or another are found in the production of panels.

Some of you are wondering, "Where is TFT?" Due to ignorance of some resources, this abbreviation is often used as a designation for the type of matrix, which is incorrect. The term TFT refers to thin film transistors used to organize the operation of subpixels. They are used in almost every type of matrix under consideration. Transistors also come in several varieties, one of which is LTPS (Polycrystalline Silicon). LTPS is a relatively new subtype that stands out for its lower power consumption and more compact transistors, which is reflected in the pixel size. As a result: higher pixel density, better and clearer picture.

TN + film

We return to matrices. Most of the matrices we are used to, as already noted, are liquid crystal, that is, LCD. The principle lies in the polarization of the light that passes through the light filter, coloring in the appropriate colors. The first of the types of liquid crystal matrices is TN + film. With the spread of "film" dropped, the name was shortened to "TN". The simplest type, which by today is rather outdated and used only in the cheapest smartphones (and even then, we still have to find). TN does not boast good viewing angles or contrast, and has poor color reproduction.

In general, avoid TN when choosing a smartphone screen - the type is outdated.

IPS

Next comes IPS. This technology is also not young - it has already passed 20 years. Meanwhile, IPS matrices are the most common in the smartphone market. Open any online store, choose the first smartphone that comes across and be convinced of my words. This type of matrix is \u200b\u200bpresented both in the budget segment and in the flagship one. In addition to improved characteristics, when compared with TN, IPS received a large number of varieties. However, you should not understand everything - in the smartphone market, the dominance is divided by two types: AH-IPS and PLS. Their creators are the two largest companies in South Korea and the whole world: LG and Samsung, respectively. What is the difference? It practically does not exist. Matrices of two types are like twin brothers, so you can not be afraid to choose a smartphone with any of them. Identity has even been the subject of litigation between companies.

IPS boasts wider viewing angles than TN, good color rendition and high pixel density for a gorgeous picture. But the power consumption is about the same - in any case, LEDs are used for backlighting. Since there are quite a few varieties of IPS matrices, they also differ in their characteristics. This difference can be seen even "by eye". Cheaper IPSs can be too faded or, on the contrary, have an oversaturated color. Complicates the choice of a smartphone screen with the fact that manufacturers are often silent about the type of matrix.

Definitely, when choosing between a TN and IPS screen, the latter is preferred.

AMOLED

An even more modern type, which today is common, as a rule, among high-end smartphones. AMOLEDs are represented by organic LEDs, which do not require external backlighting, as is the case with IPS or TN - they glow by themselves. Already at this point, their first advantage can be distinguished - their smaller size. Next - AMOLED is presented with more saturated colors. Black looks especially good, during the display of which the LED simply goes out. AMOLED displays are more contrasty, boast wide viewing angles and lower power consumption (there are nuances). It's a fairy tale, isn't it? But before choosing a smartphone with an AMOLED screen, you should know about its disadvantages.

The main disadvantage is considered to be a shorter service life compared to IPS. After a certain period of time (as a rule, after three years, changes in color are observed), on average, after 6-10 years, pixels begin to “burn out”. Moreover, bright colors are especially prone to fading, so users often use dark themes in order to extend the service life. In addition, the brightness of the colors on the screen has a significant impact on power consumption. If a bright picture is displayed in bright colors, then AMOLED consumes more power than IPS. Finally, OLED arrays are more expensive to manufacture.

Be that as it may, this does not negate the manufacturability and quality of AMOLED. Sores in the form of "fading pixels" are gradually healed, and subtypes of matrices appear that are getting better. For example, Super AMOLED. This variety appeared seven years ago, bringing a lot of improvements. Power consumption has been reduced, brightness has been increased. In addition, the air gap between the touchscreen and the matrix has disappeared, which increased the sensitivity of the screen, and also eliminated the ingress of dust.

AMOLED is today considered the most technologically advanced matrixes that are actively developing. If until recently they were used mainly in Samsung smartphones, today they are chosen by a huge number of smartphone manufacturers (almost every major brand has presented a solution with an AMOLED screen.

Design features of smartphone screens

But not only the type of matrix should be based on when choosing a smartphone screen. There are also a whole bunch of features that affect the final picture quality and feel from use. We will focus on the most important points.

Air gap

Until recently, the screens of all smartphones were represented by two components: the touch layer and the matrix itself. An air gap remained between them, the thickness of which depended directly on the manufacturer. Naturally, the thinner the layer, the better. Companies regularly reduced the air gap, making the picture quality higher and the viewing angles wider. Relatively recently, it was possible to completely get rid of the air gap thanks to the OGS technology. Now the sensory layer and the matrix are connected together. Despite the significant improvement in quality, there is also an obvious drawback. In case of damage to the OGG-screen, it will have to be replaced completely, while in displays with an air layer, only the glass takes the blow.

Be that as it may, more and more manufacturers choose OGS screens. Yes, and we advise you to give preference to this technology. Believe me, there is no need to worry about the complex repair of those feelings that you will experience when using such a display.

A relatively recent thread that Samsung brought to the market with its flagship Galaxy S6 Edge (there was also a Galaxy Note, but only one edge was bent there). The South Korean manufacturer will continue to develop the idea in subsequent smartphones, but the rest of the companies did not share the idea too much. The company bends the right and left sides of the devices - the screen seems to float to the ends. This is done not only for the sake of a spectacular appearance, but also for the convenience of the user. Additional functions are brought here, notifications can also be displayed here. A fascinating feature, but not everyone needs it.

Samsung managed to implement the curved display most successfully, therefore, if such a design is interesting, then we advise you to consider the solutions of the South Korean brand.

An even more recent trend is screens without frames. The progenitor is Sharp, which showed the first frameless smartphone back in 2014, but users were attracted by the frameless Mi Mix shown in 2016. By the summer of 2017, a number of companies announced plans to release such gadgets. The market is filling up rapidly today, with the newest models costing less than $ 100.

Currently, there are several variations of the bezel-less screen: elongated displays, which have reduced bezels at the top and bottom; familiar displays, devoid of frames on three sides (except for the bottom). The first type is the Samsung Galaxy S8, a pair of smartphones from LG (G6 and). To the second, Doogee Mix, Xiaomi Mi Mix and many others, whose ranks are constantly growing.

Bezel-less smartphones look really great, and the low cost allows everyone to try out modern technologies.

The well-known company Apple in the iPhone 6S introduced a new technology at the time of release - 3D Touch. With it, the screen began to respond not only to touches, but also to pressing force. The technology began to be used, as a rule, to perform some kind of quick action. Also, 3D Touch made it possible to work with text, draw with great comfort (the brush reacts to the force of the onslaught), and so on. The function did not become something completely unusual, but it found its user. Later, a similar technology appeared 6, was also announced in.

Touchscreen type

This is not a particularly important criterion when choosing a smartphone screen, but, nevertheless, let's dwell on it a little. There are several types of touchscreen displays: matrix (very, very rare) resistive and capacitive. Until recently, resistive screens were ubiquitous, but today they are presented only in very rare and cheap smartphones. This type differs in that it reacts to any touch: with a finger, a pen, at least control another phone. It supports only one touch, it does not always work accurately. In general, it is an obsolete type.

Capacitive screens are vastly superior to their predecessors. They already support more than one simultaneous touch, have better sensitivity, and work much more accurately. Moreover, their production is more expensive.

Whatever one may say, but the overwhelming majority of companies have abandoned resistive screens in smartphones. And this is for the best. In addition, the cost of capacitive ones is constantly decreasing, which allows manufacturers to install them in the cheapest smartphones.

Another important aspect when choosing a smartphone screen is the number of simultaneous touches. This parameter determines what operations you can perform on the display. The first smartphones equipped with resistive screens were limited to one simultaneous touch, which was not always enough. The screens of modern smartphones often support 2, 3, 5 or 10 simultaneous touches. Which gives a large number of simultaneous touches:

• Zoom and zoom. One of the first features that came to the iPhone, the first smartphone to support two simultaneous touches. For example, you can reduce or enlarge images by pinching or spreading your fingers on the screen.
• Gesture control. Multiple fingers provide the ability to use different gestures.
• Management in games. Most modern games require multiple fingers to be used simultaneously.

You shouldn't chase 10 simultaneous touches if you're not playing on your smartphone. For the vast majority of users, 5 touches are enough, and even less demanding ones will not experience discomfort even with 2.

Parameters that are significant when choosing a smartphone screen that go hand in hand. The diagonal of the display reflects its dimensions in inches.

An inch corresponds to 2.54 centimeters. For example, the diagonal of the screen of a 5-inch smartphone in centimeters is 12.7 centimeters. note: Diagonal is measured from corner to corner of the screen without touching the bezels.

What screen diagonal should I choose? You will have to answer this question yourself. The market of modern smartphones offers a variety of diagonals, ranging from about 3.5-4 inches, ending with almost 7 inches. There are also more compact options, but you can not take them into account - working with miniature icons is not very convenient. The best way to choose a diagonal is to personally hold the smartphone in your hands. If you are comfortable using one hand, then the diagonal is "yours".

It is also impossible to recommend specific numbers because each person has a different hand size and finger length. One and 6-inch is comfortable to use, the other - and 5 inches is a lot. It is also worth considering that smartphones with the same diagonal can be of different sizes in general. A simple example: 5.5 "is comparable to a 5" model with regular bezels. Therefore, when choosing a smartphone screen, it is also advisable to take into account the thickness of the frames.

Be that as it may, there is a tendency to increase the screen diagonals. If in 2011 the overwhelming majority of users limited themselves to 4 inches, then in 2014 the largest percentage belonged to 5 inches, today the market is captured by solutions with 5.5 inches.

The situation is simpler with resolution.

Resolution reflects the number of pixels per unit area. The higher the resolution, the better the picture. Again, the same resolution looks different on two different diagonals. It is also worth mentioning the pixel density per inch, which is denoted by the PPI abbreviation. Here is the same rule as in the case of resolution: the higher the density, the better. However, the experts do not agree on the exact figure: the number claims that the comfortable value starts at 350 PPI, others give large numbers, and still others - smaller ones. It should be remembered that human vision is very individual: someone will not see a pixel even at 300 PPI, while others will find something to complain about even at 500 PPI.

• with a diagonal of up to 4-4.5 inches, most smartphones receive a resolution of 840x480 pixels (approximately 250 PPI);
• 4.5 to 5 inches HD resolution (1280x720 pixels) is a good choice (density ranges from 326 to 294 PPI)
• more than 5 inches - it is worth looking towards FullHD (1920 x 1080 pixels) or even higher resolutions

The latest Samsung smartphones and a range of models from other companies have a resolution of 2560 × 1440 pixels, which provides a high pixel density and a clear picture. The recent flagship from Sony was even presented with a 4K screen resolution, which at 5.5 inches guarantees a record 801 PPI.

Screen coverage

Until recently, the screens of mobile devices were covered with ordinary plastic, which quickly scratched, distorted color rendering, and was not very tactile. It was replaced by glass, which does not care about the keys lying in the pocket. Now on the market there is not a single type of glass that is distinguished by its strength and, accordingly, by its price. Particularly popular today are 2.5D glass curved at the edges. They not only guarantee high reliability, but also give the smartphone a more stylish look.

In addition, the screens of modern smartphones have a special grease-repellent coating (oleophobic layer), which ensures good sliding of the finger, and also prevents the appearance of stains. To determine the presence of an oleophobic layer, just place a drop of water on the screen. The better the drop retains its shape (does not spread), the better the layer is.

Naturally, the quality of the oleophobic layer and glass affects the cost of the smartphone. You're unlikely to find a budget model that boasts the same durable glass as the flagship solution. Today the most popular manufacturer of protective glass is Corning, whose line ends with Gorilla Glass 5.

Additional screen

If one display is not enough for you, then a number of companies offer smartphones with additional screens. They are usually small and serve to display notifications. And YotaPhone 2, known to many, offers a second E-link display that occupies the entire back side, which is easy to read. In the LG lineup, there are solutions with a small screen that displays notifications. Recently, Meizu with its flagship has also noted a similar smartphone with an additional screen.

The second screen is a rather peculiar feature that not everyone needs. Nevertheless, such smartphones find their user, and more than one.

Conclusion

Well, they seem to have talked about all the intricacies of choosing a smartphone screen. The material turned out to be quite extensive, we hope everyone will find answers to their questions. You should not chase the most expensive screen, but it is also contraindicated to economize too much - we are looking for that very golden mean. Although the current mobile electronics market will direct you in the right direction, pointing out what is popular and in demand. Today, the risk of stumbling upon a low-quality display that will dull when pressed is much lower, manufacturers have significantly raised the bar for quality. Even third-tier companies use quite solid matrices in their ultra-budget smartphones. Well, we just have to wish you good luck in your choice.

By the way, the line of articles on the criteria for making the right choice does not end there. We have already talked about that, check it out. Soon there will be materials on the topic of choosing a processor and cameras, so subscribe to notifications and the Vkontakte group.

Proponents of technologies used in the manufacture of displays for mobile devices were divided into AMOLED lovers and LCD lovers. Both are based on different manufacturing techniques, and manufacturers only emphasize the advantages of their own manufacturing process.

So which screen is better - IPS or AMOLED? Is there a noticeable difference between these technologies, and if so, what is it?

LCD technology

LCD stands for LCD. Colors are reproduced in it in a completely different way than in AMOLED. In a liquid crystal display, the light source is a backlight. The backlight can be multiple, which saves electricity, but it is used in large TVs.

White has no wavelength of its own. It is a mixture of all the other visible colors in the spectrum. Thus, the LCD backlight must create imaginary white light as efficiently as possible in order for it to produce different colors in the LCD element. Most LCDs have a blue LED backlight that hits the phosphor and generates near white light.

The real difficulty begins when light polarizes and travels through the crystal. An LCD element can rotate it at different angles by changing the voltage applied to it. Then the light passes through another polarizing filter, offset by 90 ° in relation to the first. This dampens it depending on the angle of rotation. The light then passes through an RGB filter, creating subpixels, which are then grouped into pixels.

All of this suggests that the LCD controls the amount of light by blocking the backlight and does not generate color light for each pixel. Like AMOLEDs, LCDs can be active and passive matrix devices.

AMOLED technology

The key component of this type of screens hidden in the name is a light-emitting diode (LED). Electronics lovers knew about these bulbs before, but in the display panel they are drastically reduced and placed in the form of red, green and blue clusters, which make up a single pixel capable of reproducing white and other colors. The arrangement of these subpixels may slightly affect the display performance.

The O stands for organic. There are a number of thin organic films sandwiched between LED conductors, emitting light when current is applied.

And finally, the AM part in AMOLED stands for "active matrix" as opposed to passive technology. This indicates how each OLED is driven. To control a single pixel in a passive matrix, controllers are used to supply voltage to the required column or row. It is slow and not accurate enough. Active Matrix Systems in each LED use a TFT transistor and capacitor. By activating a row and column to access a pixel, its capacitor conserves charge between refresh cycles. This allows you to quickly and accurately manage it.

Another term that can be found is Super AMOLED, Samsung's marketing name for a display combined with a capacitive one. Usually such a screen is made as a separate layer on the outside of the display. This combination makes the display thinner.

Super AMOLED vs LCD

This profound difference in the way the displays operate has a big impact on the user experience. Color gamut is the most frequently mentioned when comparing these technologies. AMOLED provides a wider range of color options than LCD, resulting in brighter images.

OLED displays offer extra richness in greens and blues, the most powerful sub-pixel colors. Some believe that this additional saturation produces unnatural colors. LCDs tend to overcompensate for reds with more muted greens. Although they do not have a wide enough gamut, the image they create closely matches the standard color gamut profile used in photos and videos.

A closer look at smartphone displays reveals that the color gamut can vary quite significantly, even across displays of the same type. For example, although the BlackBerry Priv and Galaxy Note 5 use the same manufacturer's AMOLED display, they have completely different gamma profiles. This can be partially explained by the presence of several profiles and different image calibration by the manufacturer.

Color fidelity is another significant difference, especially when it comes to white. Testing of some of the best Android smartphones has shown that OLED displays give very accurate results, while LCDs have a slight blue tint. This is not surprising given that LCDs operate on filtered blue backlighting.

The lack of backlighting and filtering layers also speaks in favor of OLED. LCDs often let in excess light and have low contrast, as the backlight won't turn off even if the pixels are supposed to be black, while OLEDs can just turn off their pixels. The LCD filter layer also blocks some of the light, and the greater thickness means smaller viewing angles compared to OLEDs.

The downside to AMOLEDs is that different LEDs have different lifespan, which means that individual RBG components will eventually degrade at different rates. The color balance of an OLED display may shift slightly over time, and the LED backlighting of the LCD means the color balance is more stable.

Controllability

One of the main advantages of OLED screens is their high controllability at the level of each pixel. This item can be turned off to achieve black depth and high contrast ratio. Controlling the emission at the individual pixel level results in energy savings, and the absence of additional layers above the LEDs means that the surface reaches maximum light. Images become brighter and the viewing angle is improved.

Slimness and flexibility

AMOLED proponents point to a smaller screen thickness, which determines the size of the device and its weight. This is due to the lack of backlighting. Although this parameter may seem insignificant to many, it has an impact on another important indicator - the viewing angle, which directly depends on the thickness of the display.

The use of LEDs means that LED screens are extremely thin, ideal for portable applications. The absence of rigid backlighting and a breakthrough in substrate manufacturing have allowed the first generation of flexible displays to be highly promising for new form factors.

Contrast

One of the main parameters that will help you figure out which screen technology is better - IPS or AMOLED - is contrast. The advantage of LED technology is the huge contrast ratio, which is why users love this technology. When a person sees such a colorful display for the first time, he is very surprised. This is the wow effect that marketers revered.

Depth of black

The next parameter, which will help determine which screen is better - IPS or Super AMOLED, is the ability to transmit black color. Due to the fact that LED screens glow on their own, users give them an undeniable advantage. Only the pixels required in the image are involved, and not the entire screen, as in IPS. Contrast is the ratio of the brightness of the lightest and darkest areas of the screen, therefore the theoretical contrast of OLEDs is infinite, since there is no glow. But in reality, the situation is different, reflected light passes through the areas of black. The contrast difference is 20x (30,000: 1 versus 1,500: 1).

Energy consumption

Among the indicators that make it possible to determine which is better, IPS or AMOLED, users call the screen economy. In LED technology, it is achieved through the luminescence of individual subpixels. On dark scenes, the screen consumes little energy, but more on light scenes. Therefore, the power consumption of the display depends on the mode of use.

Speed

The response time also influences the opinion of consumers which display is better - IPS or AMOLED. The latter technology has a smaller value, which in theory should mean a slightly faster picture change. In reality, the longer IPS response time is almost imperceptible. And in the Samsung Galaxy S4, another problem manifested itself - a quick image change causes a noticeable visual effect.

Color rendering

Another question that allows you to choose AMOLED or IPS - which reproduces colors better? IPS displays provide images without distorting the color gamut. The color will be bright when it should be. Natural gamma on LED displays is achieved by software tuning.

White quality

True white on LED displays is said to be difficult to achieve. LCD produces an imaginary white color emitted by a phosphor. This results in shades of blue, yellow and pink instead of white. In this case, customizing the image can help.

Viewing angles

Another parameter that will help determine which matrix is \u200b\u200bbetter - IPS or AMOLED - is the preservation of color accuracy when viewed from an angle. If we talk about LCD screens, then their colors shift to the cold side, and the non-standard layout of the subpixels of LED displays, which is different from the usual one, takes the picture into different colors, for example, it can turn green or red.

Brightness

High brightness means good image readability in strong ambient light conditions. This is the next parameter that will allow you to decide which is better - IPS or AMOLED. Screen contrast won't help here. In LCD displays, white light is generated by powerful backlighting, while LED panels emit every pixel. This explains the difference in light intensity - AMOLED technologies do not yet allow the brightness of subpixels to compete with backlight lamps in LCD displays.

Definition

Which is better - IPS or AMOLED - will help to judge the detail and sharpness of the image. Some users can easily distinguish the subpixels of the LED screen, which is not very good. Nearsighted people can see them clearly even at Full HD resolution. This is due to the use of PenTile technology, which provides the same luminescence of subpixels of different colors. The image loses clarity and has less clear outlines. Traditional placement in an IPS layout means more detail and straight lines.

Pixel burnout

Another "plus" of the IPS-technology is the "minus" of the LED. fade over time. Although large enough, differences in brightness of different areas will become noticeable within a year. LCD screens are relieved of burnout problems.

The cost

The answer to the question of which is better, IPS or AMOLED also depends on the price. The cost of the device is determined by the sum of the prices of all its components, of which the display is the most expensive. But the lower price of the gadget does not mean the lower cost of the screen. For example, HTC One with IPS and Samsung Galaxy S4 with Super AMOLED cost the same, although the price is higher.

AMOLED, TFT IPS: which is better?

Technologies have qualities that can be called advantages or disadvantages, depending on the custom color and contrast settings. Although the many display modes available in modern smartphones allow for maximum quality. The reduced manufacturing costs and added benefits of OLEDs make them arguably more promising, and cheaper LCDs are destined to fill gaps in budget segments of the market.

Leading display manufacturers such as LG Display are banking on OLED technology by investing in additional manufacturing capacity. The AMOLED panel market is expected to reach $ 30 billion in 2022, more than double its current level. Not to mention the unrealized potential of the flexible display market.

The advancement of quantum dot LCDs could close the performance gap between LCD and OLED, so LCD shouldn't be dismissed for now.

When deciding which type of display to choose - Super AMOLED or IPS, which is better for the user, you should remember: each technology has its pros and cons. Only after weighing the pros and cons, taking into account the degree of importance of each parameter, it makes sense to make a choice. LCD screens offer slightly more benefits. Among them are natural high-quality color and high image brightness. LED technology is prone to excessive color saturation, poor readability in bright ambient light and a shorter lifespan. Nonetheless, AMOLED displays have an excellent "wow" effect, driving yet another victim to consumer ecstasy over and over again.

In constant competition and race between manufacturers, every year new technologies are born that surpass their predecessors in all respects. This also applies to manufacturing technologies for modern displays. Just imagine, some 15-20 years ago we knew only CRT CRT screens. They were bulky, heavy and had a low flicker frequency, which negatively affected our health. But today, users can choose between Amoled or IPS, as well as other types of matrices that allow them to make screens as flat and lightweight as possible.

In addition, modern types of matrices are distinguished by the highest image accuracy, high resolution and quality. In this article, we will focus on two modern technologies - Amoled (S-Amoled) and IPS. This knowledge will help you make the right choice for your requirements. But in order to understand which display is better in a given situation, it is necessary to disassemble both technologies separately.

1. What is an IPS-matrix, and what advantages does it have

Despite the fact that the first IPS-displays were developed back in 1996, this technology has become popular and widespread among consumers only in the last few years. During this time, IPS matrices have undergone a lot of changes and improvements, which allowed us to provide users with high-quality displays that display the most natural colors. In addition, IPS matrices have high definition and image accuracy.

When asking which screen is better than IPS or Amoled, it should be understood that the comparison is between the two most recent developments. These two technologies have different design features.

The main feature of the IPS display is natural color rendering. It is due to this quality that such screens are in great demand among professional photographers and photo editors.

1.2. Advantages of an IPS matrix

IPS displays have a number of undeniable advantages that are visible to the naked eye:

• The most natural color rendition;
• Excellent brightness and contrast of the screen;
• Accuracy and clarity of the image. It should be noted that in IPS displays the pixel grid is practically invisible to the naked eye, which makes the image even more accurate and pleasing to the eye;
• Low power consumption;
• High screen resolution. Speaking about resolution, it should be understood that the vast majority of modern IPS screens have a Full HD resolution of 1920 × 1080.

Of course, like any other IPS technology, it also has its drawbacks, however, they are minor:

• Slow response. But it is absolutely invisible to the naked eye, and if you compare with the “fastest” (in response) TN matrices, you will not notice it visually;
• Very often on the Internet you can find statements about the large and noticeable pixel grid of the IPS screen, but this parameter is by far the best among analogues. If we compare IPS with TN + Film or Amoled, then the pixel grid sizes of IPS are the smallest, which makes such screens the best in this comparison.

Of course, when comparing which is better than IPS or superAmoled, it is worth understanding that not all IPS displays are equally good, since there are different types of IPS matrices. At the same time, Amoled is a development of Samsung and they are released only under the brand of the same name, so Amoled screens practically do not differ from each other.

2. Super Amoled Matrix

This type of display was developed in 2009 by Samsung. The main and only purpose of the development of this screen is its use in mobile phones, smartphones, tablets and other mobile devices with a touch screen. Already in 2010, the Korean company released a new type of matrix called Super Amoled. The difference between Amoled and Super Amoled is that there is no air gap between the layers of the second type of screen (S-Amoled).

This solution made the screen even thinner. This also increased the brightness of the display by 20%. At the same time, energy consumption remained at the same low level. In theory, these features make Super Amoled screens impervious to bright light. In other words, the user sees the image perfectly even in direct sunlight. However, in practice this is not the case. Of course, a comparison of IPS and Super Amoled shows that S-Amoled wins in this parameter, but in any case, in direct light the picture becomes difficult to see.

2.1. Benefits of Super Amoled Matrices

If we talk about touch screens, then first of all it is worth noting that this type of screens is distinguished by higher sensitivity and quick response to user gestures. In addition, there are other benefits:

• The highest brightness among all types of screens;
• Largest viewing angles;
• High saturation and maximum number of colors and shades;
• Partial suppression of glare in sunlight, which improves the perception of the picture in bright sunlight;
• Low power consumption, which is extremely important for mobile devices;
• The service life of the screen is one of the longest.

3. Super Amoled vs IPS

So, taking into account all of the above, you can understand how Amoled differs from IPS. The first is the brightness of the screen. Super Amoled is the undisputed leader in brightness and color saturation. This is a very important parameter for mobile devices. However, if you are engaged in photo processing, then it is not brightness that is important to you, but natural color reproduction, and IPS technology has no equal in this.

Another difference is the thickness of the device. Of course, if we talk about monitors or TVs, then this parameter is not particularly important. However, when it comes to smartphones or tablets, then the clear leader is Super Amoled. Also, S-Amoled touchscreens have higher sensitivity than IPS, which provides faster and more accurate response to user commands.

IPS technology, in turn, has a finer and more invisible pixel grid. However, to see it, you must use a magnifying glass. This difference is practically invisible in a normal visual inspection.

Knowing all these differences, you can understand which display is the best IPS or Super Amoled in a given situation. No advice can be given in this case, because both screens have high quality, image accuracy and clarity, as well as display resolution.

4.LCD vs AMOLED: Video

A fairly well-established product in the IT technology market is the flagship with amoled type monitor.

AMOLED display

AMOLED technology is the brainchild of the world famous Samsung company. The invention won the love of consumers, thanks to which the manufacturer tries to improve it all the time.

First, let's figure it out, amoled display, what is it? This is an abbreviation of the capital letters, which when decoded are as follows: Active Matrix Organic Light-Emitting Diode.

A technique that allows you to create monitors for televisions, mobile phones and computers.

It is based on the use of organic light-emitting diodes as parts that emit light, and an active matrix, which consists of thin-film transistors.

Interesting in technology is a way to create black.

If it is necessary to generate it, the LEDs simply stop working, and this makes it possible to appear in a truly saturated, deep black color. When it is present on the monitor, a decrease in the power consumption of the phone is observed.

All pictures look much more attractive on the screen. Color reproduction is bright and rich. Therefore, the models hold the lead in the market along with IPS.

Phones with AMOLED display

Phones with amoled display do not lose their relevance for a long time. They have won their trust and now even practice setting in a budgetary model.

Users of such gadgets are satisfied with the color scheme provided by the developers and the devices themselves in general.

Popular models with such a screen include:

Pros of AMOLED

Of course, phones with such a display are very high status. Among their advantages is the width of the screen, in which the corners do not bend and the picture is shown in full. Also, excellent contrast.

Monitor matrices are presented in a very rich color. Black looks perfect.

When you look at such a display, you get the feeling that the picture is not in it, but on the surface. According to consumer reviews, this increases the enjoyment of using the gadget.

Disadvantages of AMOLED

Today, the quality of screens made on the basis of amoled technologies has improved so much that consumers simply do not find any negative aspects of the product.

One bad tendency is still visible. The most negative thing is that health problems appear.

Even with a short viewing of multimedia files, eyes begin to get tired, and over time, vision deterioration occurs. From overworking the eyes, the sharpness of vision is lost.

The color pictures on the screen are very bright. Not everyone can adapt to such an eyeball strain. At first, I like the brightness, but it has a destructive effect on vision.

From the side of science, it was not possible to confirm such data. After all, you need to collect a certain number of people, conduct research and draw conclusions based on statistical data. We provide information that only a few users have shared on the Internet.

Many of them wrote that after buying a phone with such a display, their eyes began to get tired, they had to buy special drops. Or one hundred percent vision has deteriorated in a short time.

Among the disadvantages of this technology, you can also highlight:

1 You need to be very careful with the phone display. If you damage it anywhere, and even the slightest air gets inside, the screen will instantly fade. Within one or two days, your mobile device will become unusable due to the fact that the monitor will stop showing at all. From the point at which the depressurization has occurred, a black spot will appear and in a short time will grow to the entire surface.

1 The connections under the shield are extremely loose. With the slightest mechanical damage, such as a crack, the monitor becomes unusable. He doesn't show.

Smartphones with AMOLED display

Smartphones with amoled displays have been on the IT market for a long time. They are known to a large number of users and have managed to gain recognition for the brightness of their color rendition.

Many manufacturers are increasingly turning to this method when creating smartphones.

So, phones Meizu Pro 6, Yota YotaPhone 2, Huawei Nexus 6P, Highscreen Bay, Lumia use amoled screens in their models.

The Microsoft Lumia 950 Dual SIM models use a 5.2-inch display created using this design methodology. Customer reviews are the most positive.

Photos and videos can be viewed freely even in the strongest sunlight.

Highscreen Bay is known for being able to reproduce even the smallest details in an image thanks to this screen technology. This is due to the excellent quality of the AMOLED matrix.

The Meizu Pro 6 phone is also equipped with a Super AMOLED matrix. His pictures are bright and clear.

Model Yota YotaPhone 2 is equipped with a 5-inch screen and AMOLED matrix.

Super AMOLED

The technology appeared in 2010. It is much better than its predecessor.

The benefits are noticeable:

• More brightness. The color gamut has become twenty percent richer.
• The viewing angle has changed. It becomes 180 degrees and the advantage is that the image remains clear and of high quality, not only for the person who is looking at the screen located directly in front of him, but also for everyone else, at any distance.
• Energy consumption has decreased by twenty percent.

Energy reserves are an ongoing problem for smartphones. It's good if the phone has enough charge until the evening, or even less. So here's a new technique slightly increased the operating time of the device.

• The phone is now more durable. New models are manufactured without an integrated air cushion. This makes it possible to make the devices much stronger, and accordingly, their service life increases.

For example, when there is a lot of white color on the screen of the phone with the display in question, then the energy goes twice as much. This doesn't happen in IPS phones.

When working with a black screen, the energy consumption figures are approximately the same. During normal operation of the device, IPS also prevails in the energy charge.

For whom it is more convenient, but when working with a phone that has a built-in amoled display, the brightness goes off scale. It gets in the way a little.

And with prolonged use, the eyes hurt and dry out. In IPS, with a more gentle color gamut, there are no such problems.

However, if you examine the speed of the phone's response to your manipulations, iPS phones respond much slower.

Its positive side is that the screen reproduces more natural colors. But when photographing on the sunny side, the device clearly lacks brightness.

Which technology is better - IPS or Amoled? Let's talk about the advantages and disadvantages of screens. How to make the right choice?

There was a time when the Samsung company loudly declared its Amoled technology, calling it almost the pinnacle in the production of matrixes. Initially, Amoled screens were used in TVs, then the technology was inherited by the brand's smartphones.

AMOLED displays are not liked for an unnatural picture, excessively high contrast, saturated colors.

At this moment, IPS screens with their clarity and natural picture appear on the market. Which is better - IPS or Amoled, as well as which display is right for you.

Advantages and disadvantages of IPS and AMOLED

Both technologies have many of them, this is a fact. Let's start with Amoled.

AMOLED – Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode... The technology provides maximum screen brightness and high image contrast, excellent glare suppression in bright daylight / sunlight / lamp light. At the same time, the screen itself consumes little energy, since the pixels are activated only at the right time, while in IPS, all the pixels are constantly active when the screen is turned on.

Disadvantages of Amoled:

• High cost of production, which significantly increases the price of a smartphone;
• High vulnerability to mechanical damage;
• Fading of colors is observed over time.

What is IPS? Here, too, everything is very ambiguous. In-Plane Switching technology was created as an ideological successor of TFT - a frankly outdated technology that does not give any juicy picture, good responsiveness, or wide viewing angles.

Getting rid of these shortcomings, IPS has become a real boon. The picture is clear, dynamic, deep and rich. But most importantly, the colors have become truly realistic. Amoled with its oversaturated color palette loses a lot in this regard. Although, this is also a matter of taste. The picture is clear, the viewing angles are excellent - everything is gorgeous.

Disadvantages of IPS:

• Active energy consumption;
• Smartphones with IPS screens are slightly thicker than their Amoled counterparts;
• IPS requires more powerful backlighting;
• Slow matrix response (only the most picky users will be able to tell the difference);
• Pixel grid visibility.

AMOLED or IPS - which to choose?

If you are faced with a choice - to buy a smartphone with an IPS or Amoled screen, start from how you will use it and what you generally expect from the screen. Want natural colors and generally good color reproduction? Choose IPS. Do you want the battery to last longer, and the picture will please with saturation and depth? Amoled for you.

At the same time, everyone should remember that you are not buying a TV, but a smartphone. The average user may not notice much difference between these technologies. And, perhaps, the best advice in choosing is to just look what you like best visually. Well, if you buy a phone for several years, then it's better to take it with an IPS-matrix. The faded colors on Amoled are clearly not to your liking. Although, again, you may not even notice them.